Now its my turn to have something to add. Most of the ideas and thoughts are not from here but have been in my head long before Denmark, at the time and place is a good opportunity to share them with others.
There is no perfect school system that pleases everyone , but there are many different solutions that put the student to do well in school and want to know to go there. Estonian school system does not need to change the way here and I do not think it's ever so lähekski, but why can not we create something new, and in the near future sort that would be very suitable for our country.
One major difference between our two countries in high school between is that here, people know why they have an upper secondary schools have come and what they are out there actually doing so (while I believe that in some schools in Estonia have this attitude widely available). I have not seen here ühetgi an outgoing teacher and do not have any reason to, because the students listen, someone has to say and what the wrong answer can not be a party to condemnation, not by the teacher or students. I've only seen a couple of times with each other over how they Smiling, because nobody was able to get a serious response arulageda. Also, there is no massive lack of, or even less so, because the school is a place where you can come up with joy (and if you're missing a lot, you're getting on and off the so-called direktsioonis also falls relatively easily guess). Certainly, in both the high school is difficult and needs to learn, which is perfectly normal.
two national examination system is very different, and the major tasks writing there is no real copy paste, strict control of the (all work released from a program review that veenuda students to work in purity of the so-called) - so in that respect we are lucky and the current examination system, I like more, than here, or what it should be a new curriculum. I think that math does not change the mandatory state exams, because unfortunately not all understand the real substance or is for some of the mysticism of mathematics. Now, it is mandatory for future gümnasistidele should make lessons more interesting and make it clear , which is something needed in real life. The man who can not be immediately understand things are not stupid or inept. Against him should not point the finger at a show or behind the whisper, if he is stupid or inept. He certainly has other strengths, but were osasi be a little bit.
High School should have more choices and finding things between the incoherent. Isklikult to me, like when you make your choice of 10 at the beginning of what you actually learn, because you already know your strengths, build on them and that some agents might be mandatory for everyone, but can choose another. and students who do not know what they want to learn how a normal class, for in the future, where others can equal volumes of different core subjects (normal class as we have at the moment). It does not interfere with anyone's choices of university admission, but it would certainly be advantages in parts, as he has studied the history of religion, or and wants them to do more study at a university, it just gives a stronger and even more interesting is the high school. Definitely would study quality improvement in the large high schools separate the main school, because there were more students and greater choice, and unfortunately, not all students in place of high school. ( Estonia is a training institution such as the shame, the world does not.)
I do not 100% familiar with the new curriculum, that it is hard to comment on whether it is better or not, but the results are later to see if it has already been implemented.
as much as different people have different the views and our values \u200b\u200bare changing with us. Regained independence in the past 19 years and only this time much has been done away, which we should be proud of (see, even in our e-elections), although the haridusüsteem never changes, it takes time, patience and the right decisions
0 comments:
Post a Comment